test/analyze3.test - master - niceSOFT/sqlite

test/analyze3.test
766 строк21 KB
dan
Handle constraints like "a=$var" where the value bound to $var is -1, 0 or 1 in the same way as a literal -1, 0, 1. This might cause excessive reprepares.
14 май 2026, 20:54
14 май 2026, 20:54672b87d
# 2009 August 06
#
# The author disclaims copyright to this source code.  In place of
# a legal notice, here is a blessing:
#
#    May you do good and not evil.
#    May you find forgiveness for yourself and forgive others.
#    May you share freely, never taking more than you give.
#
#***********************************************************************
#
# This file implements regression tests for SQLite library. This file 
# implements tests for range and LIKE constraints that use bound variables
# instead of literal constant arguments.
#

set testdir [file dirname $argv0]
source $testdir/tester.tcl
set testprefix analyze3

ifcapable !stat4 {
  finish_test
  return
}

# This test cannot be run with the sqlite3_prepare() permutation, as it
# tests that stat4 data can be used to influence the plans of queries
# based on bound variable values. And this is not possible when using
# sqlite3_prepare() - as queries cannot be internally re-prepared after
# binding values are available.
if {[permutation]=="prepare"} {
  finish_test
  return
}

#----------------------------------------------------------------------
# Test Organization:
#
# analyze3-1.*: Test that the values of bound parameters are considered 
#               in the same way as constants when planning queries that
#               use range constraints.
#
# analyze3-2.*: Test that the values of bound parameters are considered 
#               in the same way as constants when planning queries that
#               use LIKE expressions in the WHERE clause.
#
# analyze3-3.*: Test that binding to a variable does not invalidate the 
#               query plan when there is no way in which replanning the
#               query may produce a superior outcome.
#
# analyze3-4.*: Test that SQL or authorization callback errors occurring
#               within sqlite3Reprepare() are handled correctly.
#
# analyze3-5.*: Check that the query plans of applicable statements are
#               invalidated if the values of SQL parameter are modified
#               using the clear_bindings() or transfer_bindings() APIs.
# 
# analyze3-6.*: Test that the problem fixed by commit [127a5b776d] is fixed.
#
# analyze3-7.*: Test that some memory leaks discovered by fuzz testing 
#               have been fixed.
#

proc getvar {varname} { uplevel #0 set $varname }
db function var getvar

proc eqp {sql {db db}} {
  uplevel execsql [list "EXPLAIN QUERY PLAN $sql"] $db
}

proc sf_execsql {sql {db db}} {
  set ::sqlite_search_count 0
  set r [uplevel [list execsql $sql $db]]

  concat $::sqlite_search_count [$db status step] $r
}

#-------------------------------------------------------------------------
#
# analyze3-1.1.1: 
#   Create a table with two columns. Populate the first column (affinity 
#   INTEGER) with integer values from 100 to 1100. Create an index on this 
#   column. ANALYZE the table.
#
# analyze3-1.1.2 - 3.1.3
#   Show that there are two possible plans for querying the table with
#   a range constraint on the indexed column - "full table scan" or "use 
#   the index". When the range is specified using literal values, SQLite
#   is able to pick the best plan based on the samples in sqlite_stat3.
#
# analyze3-1.1.4 - 3.1.9
#   Show that using SQL variables produces the same results as using
#   literal values to constrain the range scan.
#
#   These tests also check that the compiler code considers column 
#   affinities when estimating the number of rows scanned by the "use 
#   index strategy".
#
do_test analyze3-1.1.1 {
  execsql {
    BEGIN;
    CREATE TABLE t1(x INTEGER, y);
    CREATE INDEX i1 ON t1(x);
  }
  for {set i 0} {$i < 1000} {incr i} {
    execsql { INSERT INTO t1 VALUES($i+100, $i) }
  }
  execsql {
    COMMIT;
    ANALYZE;
  }

  execsql { SELECT count(*)>0 FROM sqlite_stat4; }
} {1}

do_execsql_test analyze3-1.1.x {
  SELECT count(*) FROM t1 WHERE x>200 AND x<300;
  SELECT count(*) FROM t1 WHERE x>0 AND x<1100;
} {99 1000}

# The first of the following two SELECT statements visits 99 rows. So
# it is better to use the index. But the second visits every row in 
# the table (1000 in total) so it is better to do a full-table scan.
#
do_eqp_test analyze3-1.1.2 {
  SELECT sum(y) FROM t1 WHERE x>200 AND x<300
} {SEARCH t1 USING INDEX i1 (x>? AND x<?)}
do_eqp_test analyze3-1.1.3 {
  SELECT sum(y) FROM t1 WHERE x>0 AND x<1100 
} {SCAN t1}

# 2017-06-26:  Verify that the SQLITE_DBCONFIG_ENABLE_QPSG setting disables
# the use of bound parameters by STAT4
#
db cache flush
unset -nocomplain l
unset -nocomplain u
do_eqp_test analyze3-1.1.3.100 {
  SELECT sum(y) FROM t1 WHERE x>$l AND x<$u
} {SEARCH t1 USING INDEX i1 (x>? AND x<?)}
set l 200
set u 300
do_eqp_test analyze3-1.1.3.101 {
  SELECT sum(y) FROM t1 WHERE x>$l AND x<$u
} {SEARCH t1 USING INDEX i1 (x>? AND x<?)}
set l 0
set u 1100
do_eqp_test analyze3-1.1.3.102 {
  SELECT sum(y) FROM t1 WHERE x>$l AND x<$u
} {SCAN t1}
db cache flush
sqlite3_db_config db ENABLE_QPSG 1
do_eqp_test analyze3-1.1.3.103 {
  SELECT sum(y) FROM t1 WHERE x>$l AND x<$u
} {SEARCH t1 USING INDEX i1 (x>? AND x<?)}
db cache flush
sqlite3_db_config db ENABLE_QPSG 0
do_eqp_test analyze3-1.1.3.104 {
  SELECT sum(y) FROM t1 WHERE x>$l AND x<$u
} {SCAN t1}

do_test analyze3-1.1.4 {
  sf_execsql { SELECT sum(y) FROM t1 WHERE x>200 AND x<300 }
} {199 0 14850}
do_test analyze3-1.1.5 {
  set l [string range "200" 0 end]
  set u [string range "300" 0 end]
  sf_execsql { SELECT sum(y) FROM t1 WHERE x>$l AND x<$u }
} {199 0 14850}
do_test analyze3-1.1.6 {
  set l [expr int(200)]
  set u [expr int(300)]
  sf_execsql { SELECT sum(y) FROM t1 WHERE x>$l AND x<$u }
} {199 0 14850}
do_test analyze3-1.1.7 {
  sf_execsql { SELECT sum(y) FROM t1 WHERE x>0 AND x<1100 }
} {999 999 499500}
do_test analyze3-1.1.8 {
  set l [string range "0" 0 end]
  set u [string range "1100" 0 end]
  sf_execsql { SELECT sum(y) FROM t1 WHERE x>$l AND x<$u }
} {999 999 499500}
do_test analyze3-1.1.9 {
  set l [expr int(0)]
  set u [expr int(1100)]
  sf_execsql { SELECT sum(y) FROM t1 WHERE x>$l AND x<$u }
} {999 999 499500}


# The following tests are similar to the block above. The difference is
# that the indexed column has TEXT affinity in this case. In the tests
# above the affinity is INTEGER.
#
do_test analyze3-1.2.1 {
  execsql {
    BEGIN;
      CREATE TABLE t2(x TEXT, y);
      INSERT INTO t2 SELECT * FROM t1;
      CREATE INDEX i2 ON t2(x);
    COMMIT;
    ANALYZE;
  }
} {}
do_execsql_test analyze3-2.1.x {
  SELECT count(*) FROM t2 WHERE x>1 AND x<2;
  SELECT count(*) FROM t2 WHERE x>0 AND x<99;
} {200 990}
do_eqp_test analyze3-1.2.2 {
  SELECT sum(y) FROM t2 WHERE x>1 AND x<2
} {SEARCH t2 USING INDEX i2 (x>? AND x<?)}
do_eqp_test analyze3-1.2.3 {
  SELECT sum(y) FROM t2 WHERE x>0 AND x<99
} {SCAN t2}

do_test analyze3-1.2.4 {
  sf_execsql { SELECT sum(y) FROM t2 WHERE x>12 AND x<20 }
} {161 0 4760}
do_test analyze3-1.2.5 {
  set l [string range "12" 0 end]
  set u [string range "20" 0 end]
  sf_execsql {SELECT typeof($l), typeof($u), sum(y) FROM t2 WHERE x>$l AND x<$u}
} {161 0 text text 4760}
do_test analyze3-1.2.6 {
  set l [expr int(12)]
  set u [expr int(20)]
  sf_execsql {SELECT typeof($l), typeof($u), sum(y) FROM t2 WHERE x>$l AND x<$u}
} {161 0 integer integer 4760}
do_test analyze3-1.2.7 {
  sf_execsql { SELECT sum(y) FROM t2 WHERE x>0 AND x<99 }
} {999 999 490555}
do_test analyze3-1.2.8 {
  set l [string range "0" 0 end]
  set u [string range "99" 0 end]
  sf_execsql {SELECT typeof($l), typeof($u), sum(y) FROM t2 WHERE x>$l AND x<$u}
} {999 999 text text 490555}
do_test analyze3-1.2.9 {
  set l [expr int(0)]
  set u [expr int(99)]
  sf_execsql {SELECT typeof($l), typeof($u), sum(y) FROM t2 WHERE x>$l AND x<$u}
} {999 999 integer integer 490555}

# Same tests a third time. This time, column x has INTEGER affinity and
# is not the leftmost column of the table. This triggered a bug causing
# SQLite to use sub-optimal query plans in 3.6.18 and earlier.
#
do_test analyze3-1.3.1 {
  execsql {
    BEGIN;
      CREATE TABLE t3(y TEXT, x INTEGER);
      INSERT INTO t3 SELECT y, x FROM t1;
      CREATE INDEX i3 ON t3(x);
    COMMIT;
    ANALYZE;
  }
} {}
do_execsql_test analyze3-1.3.x {
  SELECT count(*) FROM t3 WHERE x>200 AND x<300;
  SELECT count(*) FROM t3 WHERE x>0 AND x<1100
} {99 1000}
do_eqp_test analyze3-1.3.2 {
  SELECT sum(y) FROM t3 WHERE x>200 AND x<300
} {SEARCH t3 USING INDEX i3 (x>? AND x<?)}
do_eqp_test analyze3-1.3.3 {
  SELECT sum(y) FROM t3 WHERE x>0 AND x<1100
} {SCAN t3}

do_test analyze3-1.3.4 {
  sf_execsql { SELECT sum(y) FROM t3 WHERE x>200 AND x<300 }
} {199 0 14850}
do_test analyze3-1.3.5 {
  set l [string range "200" 0 end]
  set u [string range "300" 0 end]
  sf_execsql { SELECT sum(y) FROM t3 WHERE x>$l AND x<$u }
} {199 0 14850}
do_test analyze3-1.3.6 {
  set l [expr int(200)]
  set u [expr int(300)]
  sf_execsql { SELECT sum(y) FROM t3 WHERE x>$l AND x<$u }
} {199 0 14850}
do_test analyze3-1.3.7 {
  sf_execsql { SELECT sum(y) FROM t3 WHERE x>0 AND x<1100 }
} {999 999 499500}
do_test analyze3-1.3.8 {
  set l [string range "0" 0 end]
  set u [string range "1100" 0 end]
  sf_execsql { SELECT sum(y) FROM t3 WHERE x>$l AND x<$u }
} {999 999 499500}
do_test analyze3-1.3.9 {
  set l [expr int(0)]
  set u [expr int(1100)]
  sf_execsql { SELECT sum(y) FROM t3 WHERE x>$l AND x<$u }
} {999 999 499500}

#-------------------------------------------------------------------------
# Test that the values of bound SQL variables may be used for the LIKE
# optimization.
#
drop_all_tables
do_test analyze3-2.1 {
  execsql {
    PRAGMA case_sensitive_like=off;
    BEGIN;
    CREATE TABLE t1(a, b TEXT COLLATE nocase);
    CREATE INDEX i1 ON t1(b);
  }
  for {set i 0} {$i < 1000} {incr i} {
    set t ""
    append t [lindex {a b c d e f g h i j} [expr $i/100]]
    append t [lindex {a b c d e f g h i j} [expr ($i/10)%10]]
    append t [lindex {a b c d e f g h i j} [expr ($i%10)]]
    execsql { INSERT INTO t1 VALUES($i, $t) }
  }
  execsql COMMIT
} {}
do_eqp_test analyze3-2.2 {
  SELECT count(a) FROM t1 WHERE b LIKE 'a%'
} {SEARCH t1 USING INDEX i1 (b>? AND b<?)}
do_eqp_test analyze3-2.3 {
  SELECT count(a) FROM t1 WHERE b LIKE '%a'
} {SCAN t1}

# Return the first argument if like_match_blobs is true (the default)
# or the second argument if not
#
proc ilmb {a b} {
  ifcapable like_match_blobs {return $a}
  return $b
}

do_test analyze3-2.4 {
  sf_execsql { SELECT count(*) FROM t1 WHERE b LIKE 'a%' }
} [list [ilmb 102 101] 0 100]
do_test analyze3-2.5 {
  sf_execsql { SELECT count(*) FROM t1 WHERE b LIKE '%a' }
} {999 999 100}

do_test analyze3-2.6 {
  set like "a%"
  sf_execsql { SELECT count(*) FROM t1 WHERE b LIKE $like }
} [list [ilmb 102 101] 0 100]
do_test analyze3-2.7 {
  set like "%a"
  sf_execsql { SELECT count(*) FROM t1 WHERE b LIKE $like }
} {999 999 100}
do_test analyze3-2.8 {
  set like "a"
  sf_execsql { SELECT count(*) FROM t1 WHERE b LIKE $like }
} [list [ilmb 102 101] 0 0]
do_test analyze3-2.9 {
  set like "ab"
  sf_execsql { SELECT count(*) FROM t1 WHERE b LIKE $like }
} [list [ilmb 12 11] 0 0]
do_test analyze3-2.10 {
  set like "abc"
  sf_execsql { SELECT count(*) FROM t1 WHERE b LIKE $like }
} [list [ilmb 3 2] 0 1]
do_test analyze3-2.11 {
  set like "a_c"
  sf_execsql { SELECT count(*) FROM t1 WHERE b LIKE $like }
} [list [ilmb 102 101] 0 10]


#-------------------------------------------------------------------------
# This block of tests checks that statements are correctly marked as
# expired when the values bound to any parameters that may affect the 
# query plan are modified.
#
drop_all_tables
db auth auth
proc auth {args} {
  set ::auth 1
  return SQLITE_OK
}

do_test analyze3-3.1 {
  execsql {
    BEGIN;
    CREATE TABLE t1(a, b, c);
    CREATE INDEX i1 ON t1(b);
  }
  for {set i 0} {$i < 100} {incr i} {
    execsql { INSERT INTO t1 VALUES($i, $i, $i) }
  }
  execsql COMMIT
  execsql ANALYZE
} {}
do_test analyze3-3.2.1 {
  set S [sqlite3_prepare_v2 db "SELECT * FROM t1 WHERE b>?" -1 dummy]
  sqlite3_expired $S
} {0}
do_test analyze3-3.2.2 {
  sqlite3_bind_text $S 1 "abc" 3
  sqlite3_expired $S
} {1}
do_test analyze3-3.2.4 {
  sqlite3_finalize $S
} {SQLITE_OK}

do_test analyze3-3.2.5 {
  set S [sqlite3_prepare_v2 db "SELECT * FROM t1 WHERE b=?" -1 dummy]
  sqlite3_expired $S
} {0}
do_test analyze3-3.2.6 {
  sqlite3_bind_text $S 1 "abc" 3
  sqlite3_expired $S
} {1}
do_test analyze3-3.2.7 {
  sqlite3_finalize $S
} {SQLITE_OK}

do_test analyze3-3.4.1 {
  set S [sqlite3_prepare_v2 db "SELECT * FROM t1 WHERE a=? AND b>?" -1 dummy]
  sqlite3_expired $S
} {0}
do_test analyze3-3.4.2 {
  sqlite3_bind_text $S 1 "abc" 3
  sqlite3_expired $S
} {1}
do_test analyze3-3.4.3 {
  sqlite3_bind_text $S 2 "def" 3
  sqlite3_expired $S
} {1}
do_test analyze3-3.4.4 {
  sqlite3_bind_text $S 2 "ghi" 3
  sqlite3_expired $S
} {1}
do_test analyze3-3.4.5 {
  sqlite3_expired $S
} {1}
do_test analyze3-3.4.6 {
  sqlite3_finalize $S
} {SQLITE_OK}

do_test analyze3-3.5.1 {
  set S [sqlite3_prepare_v2 db {
    SELECT * FROM t1 WHERE a IN (
      ?1, ?2, ?3, ?4, ?5, ?6, ?7, ?8, ?9, ?10,
      ?11, ?12, ?13, ?14, ?15, ?16, ?17, ?18, ?19, ?20,
      ?21, ?22, ?23, ?24, ?25, ?26, ?27, ?28, ?29, ?30, ?31
    ) AND b>?32;
  } -1 dummy]
  sqlite3_expired $S
} {0}
do_test analyze3-3.5.2 {
  sqlite3_bind_text $S 31 "abc" 3
  sqlite3_expired $S
} {0}
do_test analyze3-3.5.3 {
  sqlite3_bind_text $S 32 "def" 3
  sqlite3_expired $S
} {1}
do_test analyze3-3.5.5 {
  sqlite3_finalize $S
} {SQLITE_OK}

do_test analyze3-3.6.1 {
  set S [sqlite3_prepare_v2 db {
    SELECT * FROM t1 WHERE a IN (
      ?1, ?2, ?3, ?4, ?5, ?6, ?7, ?8, ?9, ?10,
      ?11, ?12, ?13, ?14, ?15, ?16, ?17, ?18, ?19, ?20,
      ?21, ?22, ?23, ?24, ?25, ?26, ?27, ?28, ?29, ?30, ?31, ?32
    ) AND b>?33;
  } -1 dummy]
  sqlite3_expired $S
} {0}
do_test analyze3-3.6.2 {
  sqlite3_bind_text $S 32 "abc" 3
  sqlite3_expired $S
} {1}
do_test analyze3-3.6.3 {
  sqlite3_bind_text $S 33 "def" 3
  sqlite3_expired $S
} {1}
do_test analyze3-3.6.5 {
  sqlite3_finalize $S
} {SQLITE_OK}

do_test analyze3-3.7.1 {
  set S [sqlite3_prepare_v2 db {
    SELECT * FROM t1 WHERE a IN (
      ?1, ?2, ?3, ?4, ?5, ?6, ?7, ?8, ?9, ?33,
      ?11, ?12, ?13, ?14, ?15, ?16, ?17, ?18, ?19, ?20,
      ?21, ?22, ?23, ?24, ?25, ?26, ?27, ?28, ?29, ?30, ?31, ?32
    ) AND b>?10;
  } -1 dummy]
  sqlite3_expired $S
} {0}
do_test analyze3-3.7.2 {
  sqlite3_bind_text $S 32 "abc" 3
  sqlite3_expired $S
} {0}
do_test analyze3-3.7.3 {
  sqlite3_bind_text $S 33 "def" 3
  sqlite3_expired $S
} {0}
do_test analyze3-3.7.4 {
  sqlite3_bind_text $S 10 "def" 3
  sqlite3_expired $S
} {1}
do_test analyze3-3.7.6 {
  sqlite3_finalize $S
} {SQLITE_OK}

do_test analyze3-3.8.1 {
  execsql {
    CREATE TABLE t4(x, y TEXT COLLATE NOCASE);
    CREATE INDEX i4 ON t4(y);
  }
} {}
do_test analyze3-3.8.2 {
  set S [sqlite3_prepare_v2 db {
    SELECT * FROM t4 WHERE x != ? AND y LIKE ?
  } -1 dummy]
  sqlite3_expired $S
} {0}
do_test analyze3-3.8.3 {
  sqlite3_bind_text $S 1 "abc" 3
  sqlite3_expired $S
} {0}
do_test analyze3-3.8.4 {
  sqlite3_bind_text $S 2 "def" 3
  sqlite3_expired $S
} {1}
do_test analyze3-3.8.7 {
  sqlite3_bind_text $S 2 "ghi%" 4
  sqlite3_expired $S
} {1}
do_test analyze3-3.8.8 {
  sqlite3_expired $S
} {1}
do_test analyze3-3.8.9 {
  sqlite3_bind_text $S 2 "ghi%def" 7
  sqlite3_expired $S
} {1}
do_test analyze3-3.8.10 {
  sqlite3_expired $S
} {1}
do_test analyze3-3.8.11 {
  sqlite3_bind_text $S 2 "%ab" 3
  sqlite3_expired $S
} {1}
do_test analyze3-3.8.12 {
  sqlite3_expired $S
} {1}
do_test analyze3-3.8.12 {
  sqlite3_bind_text $S 2 "%de" 3
  sqlite3_expired $S
} {1}
do_test analyze3-3.8.13 {
  sqlite3_expired $S
} {1}
do_test analyze3-3.8.14 {
  sqlite3_finalize $S
} {SQLITE_OK}

#-------------------------------------------------------------------------
# These tests check that errors encountered while repreparing an SQL
# statement within sqlite3Reprepare() are handled correctly.
#

# Check a schema error.
#
do_test analyze3-4.1.1 {
  set S [sqlite3_prepare_v2 db "SELECT * FROM t1 WHERE a=? AND b>?" -1 dummy]
  sqlite3_step $S
} {SQLITE_DONE}
do_test analyze3-4.1.2 {
  sqlite3_reset $S
  sqlite3_bind_text $S 2 "abc" 3
  execsql { DROP TABLE t1 }
  sqlite3_step $S
} {SQLITE_ERROR}
do_test analyze3-4.1.3 {
  sqlite3_finalize $S
} {SQLITE_ERROR}

# Check an authorization error.
#
do_test analyze3-4.2.1 {
  execsql {
    BEGIN;
    CREATE TABLE t1(a, b, c);
    CREATE INDEX i1 ON t1(b);
  }
  for {set i 0} {$i < 100} {incr i} {
    execsql { INSERT INTO t1 VALUES($i, $i, $i) }
  }
  execsql COMMIT
  execsql ANALYZE
  set S [sqlite3_prepare_v2 db "SELECT * FROM t1 WHERE a=? AND b>?" -1 dummy]
  sqlite3_step $S
} {SQLITE_DONE}
db auth auth
proc auth {args} {
  if {[lindex $args 0] == "SQLITE_READ"} {return SQLITE_DENY}
  return SQLITE_OK
}
do_test analyze3-4.2.2 {
  sqlite3_reset $S
  sqlite3_bind_text $S 2 "abc" 3
  sqlite3_step $S
} {SQLITE_AUTH}
do_test analyze3-4.2.4 {
  sqlite3_finalize $S
} {SQLITE_AUTH}

# Check the effect of an authorization error that occurs in a re-prepare
# performed by sqlite3_step() is the same as one that occurs within
# sqlite3Reprepare().
#
do_test analyze3-4.3.1 {
  db auth {}
  set S [sqlite3_prepare_v2 db "SELECT * FROM t1 WHERE a=? AND b>?" -1 dummy]
  execsql { CREATE TABLE t2(d, e, f) }
  db auth auth
  sqlite3_step $S
} {SQLITE_AUTH}
do_test analyze3-4.3.2 {
  sqlite3_finalize $S
} {SQLITE_AUTH}
db auth {}

#-------------------------------------------------------------------------
# Test that modifying bound variables using the clear_bindings() or
# transfer_bindings() APIs works.
#
#   analyze3-5.1.*: sqlite3_clear_bindings()
#   analyze3-5.2.*: sqlite3_transfer_bindings()
#
do_test analyze3-5.1.1 {
  drop_all_tables
  execsql {
    CREATE TABLE t1(x TEXT COLLATE NOCASE);
    CREATE INDEX i1 ON t1(x);
    INSERT INTO t1 VALUES('aaa');
    INSERT INTO t1 VALUES('abb');
    INSERT INTO t1 VALUES('acc');
    INSERT INTO t1 VALUES('baa');
    INSERT INTO t1 VALUES('bbb');
    INSERT INTO t1 VALUES('bcc');
  }

  set S [sqlite3_prepare_v2 db "SELECT * FROM t1 WHERE x LIKE ?" -1 dummy]
  sqlite3_bind_text $S 1 "a%" 2
  set R [list]
  while { "SQLITE_ROW" == [sqlite3_step $S] } {
    lappend R [sqlite3_column_text $S 0]
  }
  concat [sqlite3_reset $S] $R
} {SQLITE_OK aaa abb acc}
do_test analyze3-5.1.2 {
  sqlite3_clear_bindings $S
  set R [list]
  while { "SQLITE_ROW" == [sqlite3_step $S] } {
    lappend R [sqlite3_column_text $S 0]
  }
  concat [sqlite3_reset $S] $R
} {SQLITE_OK}
do_test analyze3-5.1.3 {
  sqlite3_finalize $S
} {SQLITE_OK}

do_test analyze3-5.1.1 {
  set S1 [sqlite3_prepare_v2 db "SELECT * FROM t1 WHERE x LIKE ?" -1 dummy]
  sqlite3_bind_text $S1 1 "b%" 2
  set R [list]
  while { "SQLITE_ROW" == [sqlite3_step $S1] } {
    lappend R [sqlite3_column_text $S1 0]
  }
  concat [sqlite3_reset $S1] $R
} {SQLITE_OK baa bbb bcc}

do_test analyze3-5.1.2 {
  set S2 [sqlite3_prepare_v2 db "SELECT * FROM t1 WHERE x = ?" -1 dummy]
  sqlite3_bind_text $S2 1 "a%" 2
  sqlite3_transfer_bindings $S2 $S1
  set R [list]
  while { "SQLITE_ROW" == [sqlite3_step $S1] } {
    lappend R [sqlite3_column_text $S1 0]
  }
  concat [sqlite3_reset $S1] $R
} {SQLITE_OK aaa abb acc}
do_test analyze3-5.1.3 {
  sqlite3_finalize $S2
  sqlite3_finalize $S1
} {SQLITE_OK}

#-------------------------------------------------------------------------

do_test analyze3-6.1 {
  execsql { DROP TABLE IF EXISTS t1 }
  execsql BEGIN
  execsql { CREATE TABLE t1(a, b, c) }
  for {set i 0} {$i < 1000} {incr i} {
    execsql "INSERT INTO t1 VALUES([expr $i/100], 'x', [expr $i/10])"
  }
  execsql {
    CREATE INDEX i1 ON t1(a, b);
    CREATE INDEX i2 ON t1(c);
  }
  execsql COMMIT
  execsql ANALYZE
} {}

do_eqp_test analyze3-6-3 {
  SELECT * FROM t1 WHERE a = 5 AND c = 13;
} {SEARCH t1 USING INDEX i2 (c=?)}

do_eqp_test analyze3-6-2 {
  SELECT * FROM t1 WHERE a = 5 AND b > 'w' AND c = 13;
} {SEARCH t1 USING INDEX i2 (c=?)}

#-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
# 2015-04-20.
# Memory leak in sqlite3Stat4ProbeFree().  (Discovered while fuzzing.)
#
do_execsql_test analyze-7.1 {
  DROP TABLE IF EXISTS t1;
  CREATE TABLE t1(a INTEGER PRIMARY KEY, b, c);
  INSERT INTO t1 VALUES(1,1,'0000');
  CREATE INDEX t0b ON t1(b);
  ANALYZE;
  SELECT c FROM t1 WHERE b=3 AND a BETWEEN 30 AND hex(1);
} {}

# At one point duplicate stat1 entries were causing a memory leak.
#
reset_db
do_execsql_test 7.2 {
  CREATE TABLE t1(a,b,c);
  CREATE INDEX t1a ON t1(a);
  ANALYZE;
  SELECT * FROM sqlite_stat1;
  INSERT INTO sqlite_stat1(tbl,idx,stat) VALUES('t1','t1a','12000');
  INSERT INTO sqlite_stat1(tbl,idx,stat) VALUES('t1','t1a','12000');
  ANALYZE sqlite_master;
}

# 2023-04-22 https://sqlite.org/forum/info/6c118daad0f1f5ef
# Case differences in the sqlite_stat4.idx field should not matter.
#
reset_db
do_execsql_test 8.0 {
  CREATE TABLE t1(a PRIMARY KEY, v) WITHOUT ROWID;
  ANALYZE sqlite_schema;
  INSERT INTO sqlite_stat1 VALUES('t1','t1','1 1');
  INSERT INTO sqlite_stat4 VALUES('t1','t1','1','0','0',X'021b76657273696f6e');
  INSERT INTO sqlite_stat4 VALUES('T1','T1','1','0','0',X'021b76657273696f6e');
  ANALYZE sqlite_schema;
} {}

# 2023-05-03 https://sqlite.org/forum/forumpost/537d8ab118
# Same index appears by two different names in the sqlite_stat4 table.
#
reset_db
do_execsql_test 8.1 {
  CREATE TABLE t1(a INT PRIMARY KEY, b INT) WITHOUT ROWID;
  ANALYZE sqlite_schema;
  INSERT INTO sqlite_stat4 VALUES
     ('t1','t1','1','2','2',X'03000103'),
     ('t1','sqlite_autoindex_t1_1','1','2','2',X'03000103');
  ANALYZE sqlite_schema;
  PRAGMA integrity_check;
} {ok}

finish_test