/
githubmirror
/
strapi
Обзор
Документация
Войти
/
githubmirror
/
strapi
Код
Запросы
0
Пакеты
0
Релизы
0
Аналитика
Безопасность
develop
.github/workflows/needs-qa-checklist.yml
90 строк
4 KB
dependabot[bot]
chore(deps): bump anthropics/claude-code-action from 1.0.123 to 1.0.132 (#26727)
22 июн 2026, 10:01
Не верифицирован
22 июн 2026, 10:01
7f91852
Код
Авторство
О чём код?
name: Needs QA Checklist # Generates a PR-specific QA checklist when the needs-qa label is added. on: pull_request_target: types: [labeled] jobs: generate-checklist: if: ${{ github.event.label.name == 'needs-qa' }} runs-on: ubuntu-latest timeout-minutes: 10 permissions: contents: read pull-requests: write steps: - name: Checkout repository uses: actions/checkout@v6 with: fetch-depth: 0 - name: Generate QA checklist uses: anthropics/claude-code-action@v1.0.132 env: GH_TOKEN: ${{ github.token }} with: github_token: ${{ github.token }} anthropic_api_key: ${{ secrets.PR_QA_ANTHROPIC_API_KEY }} prompt: | REPO: ${{ github.repository }} PR NUMBER: ${{ github.event.pull_request.number }} Generate a focused QA checklist for this pull request. Required context: 1. Fetch the PR title, body, author, labels, base branch, and changed files. 2. Fetch the PR diff. 3. Analyze the implementation impact from the PR description, changed files, and diff. Post the result as a GitHub PR comment. If a previous AI-generated QA checklist comment exists, update that comment instead of creating a duplicate. Identify the managed comment with this exact hidden marker: <!-- ai-generated-qa-checklist --> Use `gh pr view --json comments` to find the managed comment. If it exists, update that specific comment with: `gh api repos/${{ github.repository }}/issues/comments/<comment_id> --method PATCH`. The comment must use this structure: <!-- ai-generated-qa-checklist --> ## AI-generated QA checklist ### Scope / Impact - Summarize what changed and which product areas, packages, plugins, APIs, or user flows are likely affected. - Mention notable files or implementation details only when they help QA understand the risk. ### Manual QA - [ ] Specific validation steps for the main affected user flow. - [ ] Verification that the behavior matches the PR description. - [ ] Regression checks for nearby functionality. ### Edge Cases - [ ] Invalid, empty, loading, permission, locale, draft/publish, database, or plugin behavior where relevant. ### Test Setup - List required setup, fixtures, roles, content types, locales, database choice, feature flags, or plugin configuration. Write "No special setup identified" if none is needed. ### Possible QA Automation | Candidate | Test Layer | Priority | Signal | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | ... | Unit / Frontend / API Integration / E2E | Recommended / Optional | ... | ### Assumptions / Gaps - List anything important that could not be inferred from the PR description or diff. - Include "No major gaps identified" if the checklist is based on clear context. ### QA Resolution Add `qa-done` when completed, or `qa-skipped` if intentionally skipped. Keep the checklist specific to this PR. Do not include generic items unless they are tied to files, behavior, or risks in the diff. claude_args: | --allowedTools "Bash(gh pr view:*),Bash(gh pr diff:*),Bash(gh pr comment:*),Bash(gh api repos/${{ github.repository }}/issues/comments/*:*)"