/
githubmirror
/
scikit-learn
Обзор
Документация
Войти
/
githubmirror
/
scikit-learn
Код
Запросы
0
Пакеты
0
Релизы
0
Аналитика
Безопасность
1.6.1
doc/developers/develop.rst
792 строки
34 KB
Aniruddha Saha
DOC Fix typos in Developing scikit-learn estimators page (#30547)
09 янв 2025, 18:12
09 янв 2025, 18:12
ea98185
Код
Авторство
О чём код?
.. _develop: ================================== Developing scikit-learn estimators ================================== Whether you are proposing an estimator for inclusion in scikit-learn, developing a separate package compatible with scikit-learn, or implementing custom components for your own projects, this chapter details how to develop objects that safely interact with scikit-learn pipelines and model selection tools. This section details the public API you should use and implement for a scikit-learn compatible estimator. Inside scikit-learn itself, we experiment and use some private tools and our goal is always to make them public once they are stable enough, so that you can also use them in your own projects. .. currentmodule:: sklearn .. _api_overview: APIs of scikit-learn objects ============================ There are two major types of estimators. You can think of the first group as simple estimators, which consists most estimators, such as :class:`~sklearn.linear_model.LogisticRegression` or :class:`~sklearn.ensemble.RandomForestClassifier`. And the second group are meta-estimators, which are estimators that wrap other estimators. :class:`~sklearn.pipeline.Pipeline` and :class:`~sklearn.model_selection.GridSearchCV` are two examples of meta-estimators. Here we start with a few vocabulary, and then we illustrate how you can implement your own estimators. Elements of the scikit-learn API are described more definitively in the :ref:`glossary`. Different objects ----------------- The main objects in scikit-learn are (one class can implement multiple interfaces): :Estimator: The base object, implements a ``fit`` method to learn from data, either:: estimator = estimator.fit(data, targets) or:: estimator = estimator.fit(data) :Predictor: For supervised learning, or some unsupervised problems, implements:: prediction = predictor.predict(data) Classification algorithms usually also offer a way to quantify certainty of a prediction, either using ``decision_function`` or ``predict_proba``:: probability = predictor.predict_proba(data) :Transformer: For modifying the data in a supervised or unsupervised way (e.g. by adding, changing, or removing columns, but not by adding or removing rows). Implements:: new_data = transformer.transform(data) When fitting and transforming can be performed much more efficiently together than separately, implements:: new_data = transformer.fit_transform(data) :Model: A model that can give a `goodness of fit <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Goodness_of_fit>`_ measure or a likelihood of unseen data, implements (higher is better):: score = model.score(data) Estimators ---------- The API has one predominant object: the estimator. An estimator is an object that fits a model based on some training data and is capable of inferring some properties on new data. It can be, for instance, a classifier or a regressor. All estimators implement the fit method:: estimator.fit(X, y) Out of all the methods that an estimator implements, ``fit`` is usually the one you want to implement yourself. Other methods such as ``set_params``, ``get_params``, etc. are implemented in :class:`~sklearn.base.BaseEstimator`, which you should inherit from. You might need to inherit from more mixins, which we will explain later. Instantiation ^^^^^^^^^^^^^ This concerns the creation of an object. The object's ``__init__`` method might accept constants as arguments that determine the estimator's behavior (like the ``alpha`` constant in :class:`~sklearn.linear_model.SGDClassifier`). It should not, however, take the actual training data as an argument, as this is left to the ``fit()`` method:: clf2 = SGDClassifier(alpha=2.3) clf3 = SGDClassifier([[1, 2], [2, 3]], [-1, 1]) # WRONG! Ideally, the arguments accepted by ``__init__`` should all be keyword arguments with a default value. In other words, a user should be able to instantiate an estimator without passing any arguments to it. In some cases, where there are no sane defaults for an argument, they can be left without a default value. In scikit-learn itself, we have very few places, only in some meta-estimators, where the sub-estimator(s) argument is a required argument. Most arguments correspond to hyperparameters describing the model or the optimisation problem the estimator tries to solve. Other parameters might define how the estimator behaves, e.g. defining the location of a cache to store some data. These initial arguments (or parameters) are always remembered by the estimator. Also note that they should not be documented under the "Attributes" section, but rather under the "Parameters" section for that estimator. In addition, **every keyword argument accepted by** ``__init__`` **should correspond to an attribute on the instance**. Scikit-learn relies on this to find the relevant attributes to set on an estimator when doing model selection. To summarize, an ``__init__`` should look like:: def __init__(self, param1=1, param2=2): self.param1 = param1 self.param2 = param2 There should be no logic, not even input validation, and the parameters should not be changed; which also means ideally they should not be mutable objects such as lists or dictionaries. If they're mutable, they should be copied before being modified. The corresponding logic should be put where the parameters are used, typically in ``fit``. The following is wrong:: def __init__(self, param1=1, param2=2, param3=3): # WRONG: parameters should not be modified if param1 > 1: param2 += 1 self.param1 = param1 # WRONG: the object's attributes should have exactly the name of # the argument in the constructor self.param3 = param2 The reason for postponing the validation is that if ``__init__`` includes input validation, then the same validation would have to be performed in ``set_params``, which is used in algorithms like :class:`~sklearn.model_selection.GridSearchCV`. Also it is expected that parameters with trailing ``_`` are **not to be set inside the** ``__init__`` **method**. More details on attributes that are not init arguments come shortly. Fitting ^^^^^^^ The next thing you will probably want to do is to estimate some parameters in the model. This is implemented in the ``fit()`` method, and it's where the training happens. For instance, this is where you have the computation to learn or estimate coefficients for a linear model. The ``fit()`` method takes the training data as arguments, which can be one array in the case of unsupervised learning, or two arrays in the case of supervised learning. Other metadata that come with the training data, such as ``sample_weight``, can also be passed to ``fit`` as keyword arguments. Note that the model is fitted using ``X`` and ``y``, but the object holds no reference to ``X`` and ``y``. There are, however, some exceptions to this, as in the case of precomputed kernels where this data must be stored for use by the predict method. ============= ====================================================== Parameters ============= ====================================================== X array-like of shape (n_samples, n_features) y array-like of shape (n_samples,) kwargs optional data-dependent parameters ============= ====================================================== The number of samples, i.e. ``X.shape[0]`` should be the same as ``y.shape[0]``. If this requirement is not met, an exception of type ``ValueError`` should be raised. ``y`` might be ignored in the case of unsupervised learning. However, to make it possible to use the estimator as part of a pipeline that can mix both supervised and unsupervised transformers, even unsupervised estimators need to accept a ``y=None`` keyword argument in the second position that is just ignored by the estimator. For the same reason, ``fit_predict``, ``fit_transform``, ``score`` and ``partial_fit`` methods need to accept a ``y`` argument in the second place if they are implemented. The method should return the object (``self``). This pattern is useful to be able to implement quick one liners in an IPython session such as:: y_predicted = SGDClassifier(alpha=10).fit(X_train, y_train).predict(X_test) Depending on the nature of the algorithm, ``fit`` can sometimes also accept additional keywords arguments. However, any parameter that can have a value assigned prior to having access to the data should be an ``__init__`` keyword argument. Ideally, **fit parameters should be restricted to directly data dependent variables**. For instance a Gram matrix or an affinity matrix which are precomputed from the data matrix ``X`` are data dependent. A tolerance stopping criterion ``tol`` is not directly data dependent (although the optimal value according to some scoring function probably is). When ``fit`` is called, any previous call to ``fit`` should be ignored. In general, calling ``estimator.fit(X1)`` and then ``estimator.fit(X2)`` should be the same as only calling ``estimator.fit(X2)``. However, this may not be true in practice when ``fit`` depends on some random process, see :term:`random_state`. Another exception to this rule is when the hyper-parameter ``warm_start`` is set to ``True`` for estimators that support it. ``warm_start=True`` means that the previous state of the trainable parameters of the estimator are reused instead of using the default initialization strategy. Estimated Attributes ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ According to scikit-learn conventions, attributes which you'd want to expose to your users as public attributes and have been estimated or learned from the data must always have a name ending with trailing underscore, for example the coefficients of some regression estimator would be stored in a ``coef_`` attribute after ``fit`` has been called. Similarly, attributes that you learn in the process and you'd like to store yet not expose to the user, should have a leading underscore, e.g. ``_intermediate_coefs``. You'd need to document the first group (with a trailing underscore) as "Attributes" and no need to document the second group (with a leading underscore). The estimated attributes are expected to be overridden when you call ``fit`` a second time. Universal attributes ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Estimators that expect tabular input should set a `n_features_in_` attribute at `fit` time to indicate the number of features that the estimator expects for subsequent calls to :term:`predict` or :term:`transform`. See `SLEP010 <https://scikit-learn-enhancement-proposals.readthedocs.io/en/latest/slep010/proposal.html>`__ for details. Similarly, if estimators are given dataframes such as pandas or polars, they should set a ``feature_names_in_`` attribute to indicate the features names of the input data, detailed in `SLEP007 <https://scikit-learn-enhancement-proposals.readthedocs.io/en/latest/slep007/proposal.html>`__. Using :func:`~sklearn.utils.validation.validate_data` would automatically set these attributes for you. .. _rolling_your_own_estimator: Rolling your own estimator ========================== If you want to implement a new estimator that is scikit-learn compatible, there are several internals of scikit-learn that you should be aware of in addition to the scikit-learn API outlined above. You can check whether your estimator adheres to the scikit-learn interface and standards by running :func:`~sklearn.utils.estimator_checks.check_estimator` on an instance. The :func:`~sklearn.utils.estimator_checks.parametrize_with_checks` pytest decorator can also be used (see its docstring for details and possible interactions with `pytest`):: >>> from sklearn.utils.estimator_checks import check_estimator >>> from sklearn.tree import DecisionTreeClassifier >>> check_estimator(DecisionTreeClassifier()) # passes The main motivation to make a class compatible to the scikit-learn estimator interface might be that you want to use it together with model evaluation and selection tools such as :class:`~model_selection.GridSearchCV` and :class:`~pipeline.Pipeline`. Before detailing the required interface below, we describe two ways to achieve the correct interface more easily. .. topic:: Project template: We provide a `project template <https://github.com/scikit-learn-contrib/project-template/>`_ which helps in the creation of Python packages containing scikit-learn compatible estimators. It provides: * an initial git repository with Python package directory structure * a template of a scikit-learn estimator * an initial test suite including use of :func:`~utils.parametrize_with_checks` * directory structures and scripts to compile documentation and example galleries * scripts to manage continuous integration (testing on Linux, MacOS, and Windows) * instructions from getting started to publishing on `PyPi <https://pypi.org/>`__ .. topic:: :class:`base.BaseEstimator` and mixins: We tend to use "duck typing" instead of checking for :func:`isinstance`, which means it's technically possible to implement estimator without inheriting from scikit-learn classes. However, if you don't inherit from the right mixins, either there will be a large amount of boilerplate code for you to implement and keep in sync with scikit-learn development, or your estimator might not function the same way as a scikit-learn estimator. Here we only document how to develop an estimator using our mixins. If you're interested in implementing your estimator without inheriting from scikit-learn mixins, you'd need to check our implementations. For example, below is a custom classifier, with more examples included in the scikit-learn-contrib `project template <https://github.com/scikit-learn-contrib/project-template/blob/master/skltemplate/_template.py>`__. It is particularly important to notice that mixins should be "on the left" while the ``BaseEstimator`` should be "on the right" in the inheritance list for proper MRO. >>> import numpy as np >>> from sklearn.base import BaseEstimator, ClassifierMixin >>> from sklearn.utils.validation import validate_data, check_is_fitted >>> from sklearn.utils.multiclass import unique_labels >>> from sklearn.metrics import euclidean_distances >>> class TemplateClassifier(ClassifierMixin, BaseEstimator): ... ... def __init__(self, demo_param='demo'): ... self.demo_param = demo_param ... ... def fit(self, X, y): ... ... # Check that X and y have correct shape, set n_features_in_, etc. ... X, y = validate_data(self, X, y) ... # Store the classes seen during fit ... self.classes_ = unique_labels(y) ... ... self.X_ = X ... self.y_ = y ... # Return the classifier ... return self ... ... def predict(self, X): ... ... # Check if fit has been called ... check_is_fitted(self) ... ... # Input validation ... X = validate_data(self, X, reset=False) ... ... closest = np.argmin(euclidean_distances(X, self.X_), axis=1) ... return self.y_[closest] And you can check that the above estimator passes all common checks:: >>> from sklearn.utils.estimator_checks import check_estimator >>> check_estimator(TemplateClassifier()) # passes get_params and set_params ------------------------- All scikit-learn estimators have ``get_params`` and ``set_params`` functions. The ``get_params`` function takes no arguments and returns a dict of the ``__init__`` parameters of the estimator, together with their values. It takes one keyword argument, ``deep``, which receives a boolean value that determines whether the method should return the parameters of sub-estimators (only relevant for meta-estimators). The default value for ``deep`` is ``True``. For instance considering the following estimator:: >>> from sklearn.base import BaseEstimator >>> from sklearn.linear_model import LogisticRegression >>> class MyEstimator(BaseEstimator): ... def __init__(self, subestimator=None, my_extra_param="random"): ... self.subestimator = subestimator ... self.my_extra_param = my_extra_param The parameter `deep` controls control whether or not the parameters of the `subestimator` should be reported. Thus when `deep=True`, the output will be:: >>> my_estimator = MyEstimator(subestimator=LogisticRegression()) >>> for param, value in my_estimator.get_params(deep=True).items(): ... print(f"{param} -> {value}") my_extra_param -> random subestimator__C -> 1.0 subestimator__class_weight -> None subestimator__dual -> False subestimator__fit_intercept -> True subestimator__intercept_scaling -> 1 subestimator__l1_ratio -> None subestimator__max_iter -> 100 subestimator__multi_class -> deprecated subestimator__n_jobs -> None subestimator__penalty -> l2 subestimator__random_state -> None subestimator__solver -> lbfgs subestimator__tol -> 0.0001 subestimator__verbose -> 0 subestimator__warm_start -> False subestimator -> LogisticRegression() If the meta-estimator takes multiple sub-estimators, often, those sub-estimators have names (as e.g. named steps in a :class:`~pipeline.Pipeline` object), in which case the key should become `<name>__C`, `<name>__class_weight`, etc. When ``deep=False``, the output will be:: >>> for param, value in my_estimator.get_params(deep=False).items(): ... print(f"{param} -> {value}") my_extra_param -> random subestimator -> LogisticRegression() On the other hand, ``set_params`` takes the parameters of ``__init__`` as keyword arguments, unpacks them into a dict of the form ``'parameter': value`` and sets the parameters of the estimator using this dict. It returns the estimator itself. The :func:`~base.BaseEstimator.set_params` function is used to set parameters during grid search for instance. .. _cloning: Cloning ------- As already mentioned that when constructor arguments are mutable, they should be copied before modifying them. This also applies to constructor arguments which are estimators. That's why meta-estimators such as :class:`~model_selection.GridSearchCV` create a copy of the given estimator before modifying it. However, in scikit-learn, when we copy an estimator, we get an unfitted estimator where only the constructor arguments are copied (with some exceptions, e.g. attributes related to certain internal machinery such as metadata routing). The function responsible for this behavior is :func:`~base.clone`. Estimators can customize the behavior of :func:`base.clone` by overriding the :func:`base.BaseEstimator.__sklearn_clone__` method. `__sklearn_clone__` must return an instance of the estimator. `__sklearn_clone__` is useful when an estimator needs to hold on to some state when :func:`base.clone` is called on the estimator. For example, :class:`~sklearn.frozen.FrozenEstimator` makes use of this. Estimator types --------------- Among simple estimators (as opposed to meta-estimators), the most common types are transformers, classifiers, regressors, and clustering algorithms. **Transformers** inherit from :class:`~base.TransformerMixin`, and implement a `transform` method. These are estimators which take the input, and transform it in some way. Note that they should never change the number of input samples, and the output of `transform` should correspond to its input samples in the same given order. **Regressors** inherit from :class:`~base.RegressorMixin`, and implement a `predict` method. They should accept numerical ``y`` in their `fit` method. Regressors use :func:`~metrics.r2_score` by default in their :func:`~base.RegressorMixin.score` method. **Classifiers** inherit from :class:`~base.ClassifierMixin`. If it applies, classifiers can implement ``decision_function`` to return raw decision values, based on which ``predict`` can make its decision. If calculating probabilities is supported, classifiers can also implement ``predict_proba`` and ``predict_log_proba``. Classifiers should accept ``y`` (target) arguments to ``fit`` that are sequences (lists, arrays) of either strings or integers. They should not assume that the class labels are a contiguous range of integers; instead, they should store a list of classes in a ``classes_`` attribute or property. The order of class labels in this attribute should match the order in which ``predict_proba``, ``predict_log_proba`` and ``decision_function`` return their values. The easiest way to achieve this is to put:: self.classes_, y = np.unique(y, return_inverse=True) in ``fit``. This returns a new ``y`` that contains class indexes, rather than labels, in the range [0, ``n_classes``). A classifier's ``predict`` method should return arrays containing class labels from ``classes_``. In a classifier that implements ``decision_function``, this can be achieved with:: def predict(self, X): D = self.decision_function(X) return self.classes_[np.argmax(D, axis=1)] The :mod:`~sklearn.utils.multiclass` module contains useful functions for working with multiclass and multilabel problems. **Clustering algorithms** inherit from :class:`~base.ClusterMixin`. Ideally, they should accept a ``y`` parameter in their ``fit`` method, but it should be ignored. Clustering algorithms should set a ``labels_`` attribute, storing the labels assigned to each sample. If applicale, they can also implement a ``predict`` method, returning the labels assigned to newly given samples. If one needs to check the type of a given estimator, e.g. in a meta-estimator, one can check if the given object implements a ``transform`` method for transformers, and otherwise use helper functions such as :func:`~base.is_classifier` or :func:`~base.is_regressor`. .. _estimator_tags: Estimator Tags -------------- .. note:: Scikit-learn introduced estimator tags in version 0.21 as a private API and mostly used in tests. However, these tags expanded over time and many third party developers also need to use them. Therefore in version 1.6 the API for the tags were revamped and exposed as public API. The estimator tags are annotations of estimators that allow programmatic inspection of their capabilities, such as sparse matrix support, supported output types and supported methods. The estimator tags are an instance of :class:`~sklearn.utils.Tags` returned by the method :meth:`~sklearn.base.BaseEstimator.__sklearn_tags__()`. These tags are used in different places, such as :func:`~base.is_regressor` or the common checks run by :func:`~sklearn.utils.estimator_checks.check_estimator` and :func:`~sklearn.utils.estimator_checks.parametrize_with_checks`, where tags determine which checks to run and what input data is appropriate. Tags can depend on estimator parameters or even system architecture and can in general only be determined at runtime and are therefore instance attributes rather than class attributes. See :class:`~sklearn.utils.Tags` for more information about individual tags. It is unlikely that the default values for each tag will suit the needs of your specific estimator. You can change the default values by defining a `__sklearn_tags__()` method which returns the new values for your estimator's tags. For example:: class MyMultiOutputEstimator(BaseEstimator): def __sklearn_tags__(self): tags = super().__sklearn_tags__() tags.target_tags.single_output = False tags.non_deterministic = True return tags You can create a new subclass of :class:`~sklearn.utils.Tags` if you wish to add new tags to the existing set. Note that all attributes that you add in a child class need to have a default value. It can be of the form:: from dataclasses import dataclass, asdict @dataclass class MyTags(Tags): my_tag: bool = True class MyEstimator(BaseEstimator): def __sklearn_tags__(self): tags_orig = super().__sklearn_tags__() as_dict = { field.name: getattr(tags_orig, field.name) for field in fields(tags_orig) } tags = MyTags(**as_dict) tags.my_tag = True return tags .. _developer_api_set_output: Developer API for `set_output` ============================== With `SLEP018 <https://scikit-learn-enhancement-proposals.readthedocs.io/en/latest/slep018/proposal.html>`__, scikit-learn introduces the `set_output` API for configuring transformers to output pandas DataFrames. The `set_output` API is automatically defined if the transformer defines :term:`get_feature_names_out` and subclasses :class:`base.TransformerMixin`. :term:`get_feature_names_out` is used to get the column names of pandas output. :class:`base.OneToOneFeatureMixin` and :class:`base.ClassNamePrefixFeaturesOutMixin` are helpful mixins for defining :term:`get_feature_names_out`. :class:`base.OneToOneFeatureMixin` is useful when the transformer has a one-to-one correspondence between input features and output features, such as :class:`~preprocessing.StandardScaler`. :class:`base.ClassNamePrefixFeaturesOutMixin` is useful when the transformer needs to generate its own feature names out, such as :class:`~decomposition.PCA`. You can opt-out of the `set_output` API by setting `auto_wrap_output_keys=None` when defining a custom subclass:: class MyTransformer(TransformerMixin, BaseEstimator, auto_wrap_output_keys=None): def fit(self, X, y=None): return self def transform(self, X, y=None): return X def get_feature_names_out(self, input_features=None): ... The default value for `auto_wrap_output_keys` is `("transform",)`, which automatically wraps `fit_transform` and `transform`. The `TransformerMixin` uses the `__init_subclass__` mechanism to consume `auto_wrap_output_keys` and pass all other keyword arguments to it's super class. Super classes' `__init_subclass__` should **not** depend on `auto_wrap_output_keys`. For transformers that return multiple arrays in `transform`, auto wrapping will only wrap the first array and not alter the other arrays. See :ref:`sphx_glr_auto_examples_miscellaneous_plot_set_output.py` for an example on how to use the API. .. _developer_api_check_is_fitted: Developer API for `check_is_fitted` =================================== By default :func:`~sklearn.utils.validation.check_is_fitted` checks if there are any attributes in the instance with a trailing underscore, e.g. `coef_`. An estimator can change the behavior by implementing a `__sklearn_is_fitted__` method taking no input and returning a boolean. If this method exists, :func:`~sklearn.utils.validation.check_is_fitted` simply returns its output. See :ref:`sphx_glr_auto_examples_developing_estimators_sklearn_is_fitted.py` for an example on how to use the API. Developer API for HTML representation ===================================== .. warning:: The HTML representation API is experimental and the API is subject to change. Estimators inheriting from :class:`~sklearn.base.BaseEstimator` display a HTML representation of themselves in interactive programming environments such as Jupyter notebooks. For instance, we can display this HTML diagram:: from sklearn.base import BaseEstimator BaseEstimator() The raw HTML representation is obtained by invoking the function :func:`~sklearn.utils.estimator_html_repr` on an estimator instance. To customize the URL linking to an estimator's documentation (i.e. when clicking on the "?" icon), override the `_doc_link_module` and `_doc_link_template` attributes. In addition, you can provide a `_doc_link_url_param_generator` method. Set `_doc_link_module` to the name of the (top level) module that contains your estimator. If the value does not match the top level module name, the HTML representation will not contain a link to the documentation. For scikit-learn estimators this is set to `"sklearn"`. The `_doc_link_template` is used to construct the final URL. By default, it can contain two variables: `estimator_module` (the full name of the module containing the estimator) and `estimator_name` (the class name of the estimator). If you need more variables you should implement the `_doc_link_url_param_generator` method which should return a dictionary of the variables and their values. This dictionary will be used to render the `_doc_link_template`. .. _coding-guidelines: Coding guidelines ================= The following are some guidelines on how new code should be written for inclusion in scikit-learn, and which may be appropriate to adopt in external projects. Of course, there are special cases and there will be exceptions to these rules. However, following these rules when submitting new code makes the review easier so new code can be integrated in less time. Uniformly formatted code makes it easier to share code ownership. The scikit-learn project tries to closely follow the official Python guidelines detailed in `PEP8 <https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0008>`_ that detail how code should be formatted and indented. Please read it and follow it. In addition, we add the following guidelines: * Use underscores to separate words in non class names: ``n_samples`` rather than ``nsamples``. * Avoid multiple statements on one line. Prefer a line return after a control flow statement (``if``/``for``). * Use relative imports for references inside scikit-learn. * Unit tests are an exception to the previous rule; they should use absolute imports, exactly as client code would. A corollary is that, if ``sklearn.foo`` exports a class or function that is implemented in ``sklearn.foo.bar.baz``, the test should import it from ``sklearn.foo``. * **Please don't use** ``import *`` **in any case**. It is considered harmful by the `official Python recommendations <https://docs.python.org/3.1/howto/doanddont.html#at-module-level>`_. It makes the code harder to read as the origin of symbols is no longer explicitly referenced, but most important, it prevents using a static analysis tool like `pyflakes <https://divmod.readthedocs.io/en/latest/products/pyflakes.html>`_ to automatically find bugs in scikit-learn. * Use the `numpy docstring standard <https://numpydoc.readthedocs.io/en/latest/format.html#docstring-standard>`_ in all your docstrings. A good example of code that we like can be found `here <https://gist.github.com/nateGeorge/5455d2c57fb33c1ae04706f2dc4fee01>`_. Input validation ---------------- .. currentmodule:: sklearn.utils The module :mod:`sklearn.utils` contains various functions for doing input validation and conversion. Sometimes, ``np.asarray`` suffices for validation; do *not* use ``np.asanyarray`` or ``np.atleast_2d``, since those let NumPy's ``np.matrix`` through, which has a different API (e.g., ``*`` means dot product on ``np.matrix``, but Hadamard product on ``np.ndarray``). In other cases, be sure to call :func:`check_array` on any array-like argument passed to a scikit-learn API function. The exact parameters to use depends mainly on whether and which ``scipy.sparse`` matrices must be accepted. For more information, refer to the :ref:`developers-utils` page. Random Numbers -------------- If your code depends on a random number generator, do not use ``numpy.random.random()`` or similar routines. To ensure repeatability in error checking, the routine should accept a keyword ``random_state`` and use this to construct a ``numpy.random.RandomState`` object. See :func:`sklearn.utils.check_random_state` in :ref:`developers-utils`. Here's a simple example of code using some of the above guidelines:: from sklearn.utils import check_array, check_random_state def choose_random_sample(X, random_state=0): """Choose a random point from X. Parameters ---------- X : array-like of shape (n_samples, n_features) An array representing the data. random_state : int or RandomState instance, default=0 The seed of the pseudo random number generator that selects a random sample. Pass an int for reproducible output across multiple function calls. See :term:`Glossary <random_state>`. Returns ------- x : ndarray of shape (n_features,) A random point selected from X. """ X = check_array(X) random_state = check_random_state(random_state) i = random_state.randint(X.shape[0]) return X[i] If you use randomness in an estimator instead of a freestanding function, some additional guidelines apply. First off, the estimator should take a ``random_state`` argument to its ``__init__`` with a default value of ``None``. It should store that argument's value, **unmodified**, in an attribute ``random_state``. ``fit`` can call ``check_random_state`` on that attribute to get an actual random number generator. If, for some reason, randomness is needed after ``fit``, the RNG should be stored in an attribute ``random_state_``. The following example should make this clear:: class GaussianNoise(BaseEstimator, TransformerMixin): """This estimator ignores its input and returns random Gaussian noise. It also does not adhere to all scikit-learn conventions, but showcases how to handle randomness. """ def __init__(self, n_components=100, random_state=None): self.random_state = random_state self.n_components = n_components # the arguments are ignored anyway, so we make them optional def fit(self, X=None, y=None): self.random_state_ = check_random_state(self.random_state) def transform(self, X): n_samples = X.shape[0] return self.random_state_.randn(n_samples, self.n_components) The reason for this setup is reproducibility: when an estimator is ``fit`` twice to the same data, it should produce an identical model both times, hence the validation in ``fit``, not ``__init__``. Numerical assertions in tests ----------------------------- When asserting the quasi-equality of arrays of continuous values, do use `sklearn.utils._testing.assert_allclose`. The relative tolerance is automatically inferred from the provided arrays dtypes (for float32 and float64 dtypes in particular) but you can override via ``rtol``. When comparing arrays of zero-elements, please do provide a non-zero value for the absolute tolerance via ``atol``. For more information, please refer to the docstring of `sklearn.utils._testing.assert_allclose`.