src/hotspot/os_cpu/linux_zero/atomic_linux_zero.hpp - master - githubmirror/jdk17u-dev

src/hotspot/os_cpu/linux_zero/atomic_linux_zero.hpp
153 строки6 KB
Jie Fu
8255040: Replace __sync_add_and_fetch with __atomic_add_fetch to avoid build errors with clang
27 окт 2020, 08:50
27 окт 2020, 08:50d735f91
/*
 * Copyright (c) 2003, 2020, Oracle and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved.
 * Copyright 2007, 2008, 2011, 2015, Red Hat, Inc.
 * DO NOT ALTER OR REMOVE COPYRIGHT NOTICES OR THIS FILE HEADER.
 *
 * This code is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it
 * under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 only, as
 * published by the Free Software Foundation.
 *
 * This code is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, but WITHOUT
 * ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of MERCHANTABILITY or
 * FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.  See the GNU General Public License
 * version 2 for more details (a copy is included in the LICENSE file that
 * accompanied this code).
 *
 * You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License version
 * 2 along with this work; if not, write to the Free Software Foundation,
 * Inc., 51 Franklin St, Fifth Floor, Boston, MA 02110-1301 USA.
 *
 * Please contact Oracle, 500 Oracle Parkway, Redwood Shores, CA 94065 USA
 * or visit www.oracle.com if you need additional information or have any
 * questions.
 *
 */

#ifndef OS_CPU_LINUX_ZERO_ATOMIC_LINUX_ZERO_HPP
#define OS_CPU_LINUX_ZERO_ATOMIC_LINUX_ZERO_HPP

#include "orderAccess_linux_zero.hpp"
#include "runtime/os.hpp"

// Implementation of class atomic

template<size_t byte_size>
struct Atomic::PlatformAdd {
  template<typename D, typename I>
  D add_and_fetch(D volatile* dest, I add_value, atomic_memory_order order) const;

  template<typename D, typename I>
  D fetch_and_add(D volatile* dest, I add_value, atomic_memory_order order) const {
    return add_and_fetch(dest, add_value, order) - add_value;
  }
};

template<>
template<typename D, typename I>
inline D Atomic::PlatformAdd<4>::add_and_fetch(D volatile* dest, I add_value,
                                               atomic_memory_order order) const {
  STATIC_ASSERT(4 == sizeof(I));
  STATIC_ASSERT(4 == sizeof(D));

  D res = __atomic_add_fetch(dest, add_value, __ATOMIC_RELEASE);
  FULL_MEM_BARRIER;
  return res;
}

template<>
template<typename D, typename I>
inline D Atomic::PlatformAdd<8>::add_and_fetch(D volatile* dest, I add_value,
                                               atomic_memory_order order) const {
  STATIC_ASSERT(8 == sizeof(I));
  STATIC_ASSERT(8 == sizeof(D));

  D res = __atomic_add_fetch(dest, add_value, __ATOMIC_RELEASE);
  FULL_MEM_BARRIER;
  return res;
}

template<>
template<typename T>
inline T Atomic::PlatformXchg<4>::operator()(T volatile* dest,
                                             T exchange_value,
                                             atomic_memory_order order) const {
  STATIC_ASSERT(4 == sizeof(T));
  // __sync_lock_test_and_set is a bizarrely named atomic exchange
  // operation.  Note that some platforms only support this with the
  // limitation that the only valid value to store is the immediate
  // constant 1.  There is a test for this in JNI_CreateJavaVM().
  T result = __sync_lock_test_and_set (dest, exchange_value);
  // All atomic operations are expected to be full memory barriers
  // (see atomic.hpp). However, __sync_lock_test_and_set is not
  // a full memory barrier, but an acquire barrier. Hence, this added
  // barrier. Some platforms (notably ARM) have peculiarities with
  // their barrier implementations, delegate it to OrderAccess.
  OrderAccess::fence();
  return result;
}

template<>
template<typename T>
inline T Atomic::PlatformXchg<8>::operator()(T volatile* dest,
                                             T exchange_value,
                                             atomic_memory_order order) const {
  STATIC_ASSERT(8 == sizeof(T));
  T result = __sync_lock_test_and_set (dest, exchange_value);
  OrderAccess::fence();
  return result;
}

// No direct support for cmpxchg of bytes; emulate using int.
template<>
struct Atomic::PlatformCmpxchg<1> : Atomic::CmpxchgByteUsingInt {};

template<>
template<typename T>
inline T Atomic::PlatformCmpxchg<4>::operator()(T volatile* dest,
                                                T compare_value,
                                                T exchange_value,
                                                atomic_memory_order order) const {
  STATIC_ASSERT(4 == sizeof(T));

  T value = compare_value;
  FULL_MEM_BARRIER;
  __atomic_compare_exchange(dest, &value, &exchange_value, /*weak*/false,
                            __ATOMIC_RELAXED, __ATOMIC_RELAXED);
  FULL_MEM_BARRIER;
  return value;
}

template<>
template<typename T>
inline T Atomic::PlatformCmpxchg<8>::operator()(T volatile* dest,
                                                T compare_value,
                                                T exchange_value,
                                                atomic_memory_order order) const {
  STATIC_ASSERT(8 == sizeof(T));

  FULL_MEM_BARRIER;
  T value = compare_value;
  __atomic_compare_exchange(dest, &value, &exchange_value, /*weak*/false,
                            __ATOMIC_RELAXED, __ATOMIC_RELAXED);
  FULL_MEM_BARRIER;
  return value;
}

template<>
template<typename T>
inline T Atomic::PlatformLoad<8>::operator()(T const volatile* src) const {
  STATIC_ASSERT(8 == sizeof(T));
  volatile int64_t dest;
  os::atomic_copy64(reinterpret_cast<const volatile int64_t*>(src), reinterpret_cast<volatile int64_t*>(&dest));
  return PrimitiveConversions::cast<T>(dest);
}

template<>
template<typename T>
inline void Atomic::PlatformStore<8>::operator()(T volatile* dest,
                                                 T store_value) const {
  STATIC_ASSERT(8 == sizeof(T));
  os::atomic_copy64(reinterpret_cast<const volatile int64_t*>(&store_value), reinterpret_cast<volatile int64_t*>(dest));
}

#endif // OS_CPU_LINUX_ZERO_ATOMIC_LINUX_ZERO_HPP