githubmirror/cpython

Doc/howto/annotations.rst
232 строки9 KB
Jelle Zijlstra
[3.10] gh-99535: Add test for inheritance of annotations and update documentation (GH-99990) (#100509)
27 дек 2022, 07:44
27 дек 2022, 07:441ffc672
.. _annotations-howto:

**************************
Annotations Best Practices
**************************

:author: Larry Hastings

.. topic:: Abstract

  This document is designed to encapsulate the best practices
  for working with annotations dicts.  If you write Python code
  that examines ``__annotations__`` on Python objects, we
  encourage you to follow the guidelines described below.

  The document is organized into four sections:
  best practices for accessing the annotations of an object
  in Python versions 3.10 and newer,
  best practices for accessing the annotations of an object
  in Python versions 3.9 and older,
  other best practices
  for ``__annotations__`` that apply to any Python version,
  and
  quirks of ``__annotations__``.

  Note that this document is specifically about working with
  ``__annotations__``, not uses *for* annotations.
  If you're looking for information on how to use "type hints"
  in your code, please see the :mod:`typing` module.


Accessing The Annotations Dict Of An Object In Python 3.10 And Newer
====================================================================

  Python 3.10 adds a new function to the standard library:
  :func:`inspect.get_annotations`.  In Python versions 3.10
  and newer, calling this function is the best practice for
  accessing the annotations dict of any object that supports
  annotations.  This function can also "un-stringize"
  stringized annotations for you.

  If for some reason :func:`inspect.get_annotations` isn't
  viable for your use case, you may access the
  ``__annotations__`` data member manually.  Best practice
  for this changed in Python 3.10 as well: as of Python 3.10,
  ``o.__annotations__`` is guaranteed to *always* work
  on Python functions, classes, and modules.  If you're
  certain the object you're examining is one of these three
  *specific* objects, you may simply use ``o.__annotations__``
  to get at the object's annotations dict.

  However, other types of callables--for example,
  callables created by :func:`functools.partial`--may
  not have an ``__annotations__`` attribute defined.  When
  accessing the ``__annotations__`` of a possibly unknown
  object,  best practice in Python versions 3.10 and
  newer is to call :func:`getattr` with three arguments,
  for example ``getattr(o, '__annotations__', None)``.

  Before Python 3.10, accessing ``__annotations__`` on a class that
  defines no annotations but that has a parent class with
  annotations would return the parent's ``__annotations__``.
  In Python 3.10 and newer, the child class's annotations
  will be an empty dict instead.


Accessing The Annotations Dict Of An Object In Python 3.9 And Older
===================================================================

  In Python 3.9 and older, accessing the annotations dict
  of an object is much more complicated than in newer versions.
  The problem is a design flaw in these older versions of Python,
  specifically to do with class annotations.

  Best practice for accessing the annotations dict of other
  objects--functions, other callables, and modules--is the same
  as best practice for 3.10, assuming you aren't calling
  :func:`inspect.get_annotations`: you should use three-argument
  :func:`getattr` to access the object's ``__annotations__``
  attribute.

  Unfortunately, this isn't best practice for classes.  The problem
  is that, since ``__annotations__`` is optional on classes, and
  because classes can inherit attributes from their base classes,
  accessing the ``__annotations__`` attribute of a class may
  inadvertently return the annotations dict of a *base class.*
  As an example::

      class Base:
          a: int = 3
          b: str = 'abc'

      class Derived(Base):
          pass

      print(Derived.__annotations__)

  This will print the annotations dict from ``Base``, not
  ``Derived``.

  Your code will have to have a separate code path if the object
  you're examining is a class (``isinstance(o, type)``).
  In that case, best practice relies on an implementation detail
  of Python 3.9 and before: if a class has annotations defined,
  they are stored in the class's ``__dict__`` dictionary.  Since
  the class may or may not have annotations defined, best practice
  is to call the ``get`` method on the class dict.

  To put it all together, here is some sample code that safely
  accesses the ``__annotations__`` attribute on an arbitrary
  object in Python 3.9 and before::

      if isinstance(o, type):
          ann = o.__dict__.get('__annotations__', None)
      else:
          ann = getattr(o, '__annotations__', None)

  After running this code, ``ann`` should be either a
  dictionary or ``None``.  You're encouraged to double-check
  the type of ``ann`` using :func:`isinstance` before further
  examination.

  Note that some exotic or malformed type objects may not have
  a ``__dict__`` attribute, so for extra safety you may also wish
  to use :func:`getattr` to access ``__dict__``.


Manually Un-Stringizing Stringized Annotations
==============================================

  In situations where some annotations may be "stringized",
  and you wish to evaluate those strings to produce the
  Python values they represent, it really is best to
  call :func:`inspect.get_annotations` to do this work
  for you.

  If you're using Python 3.9 or older, or if for some reason
  you can't use :func:`inspect.get_annotations`, you'll need
  to duplicate its logic.  You're encouraged to examine the
  implementation of :func:`inspect.get_annotations` in the
  current Python version and follow a similar approach.

  In a nutshell, if you wish to evaluate a stringized annotation
  on an arbitrary object ``o``:

  * If ``o`` is a module, use ``o.__dict__`` as the
    ``globals`` when calling :func:`eval`.
  * If ``o`` is a class, use ``sys.modules[o.__module__].__dict__``
    as the ``globals``, and ``dict(vars(o))`` as the ``locals``,
    when calling :func:`eval`.
  * If ``o`` is a wrapped callable using :func:`functools.update_wrapper`,
    :func:`functools.wraps`, or :func:`functools.partial`, iteratively
    unwrap it by accessing either ``o.__wrapped__`` or ``o.func`` as
    appropriate, until you have found the root unwrapped function.
  * If ``o`` is a callable (but not a class), use
    ``o.__globals__`` as the globals when calling :func:`eval`.

  However, not all string values used as annotations can
  be successfully turned into Python values by :func:`eval`.
  String values could theoretically contain any valid string,
  and in practice there are valid use cases for type hints that
  require annotating with string values that specifically
  *can't* be evaluated.  For example:

  * :pep:`604` union types using ``|``, before support for this
    was added to Python 3.10.
  * Definitions that aren't needed at runtime, only imported
    when :const:`typing.TYPE_CHECKING` is true.

  If :func:`eval` attempts to evaluate such values, it will
  fail and raise an exception.  So, when designing a library
  API that works with annotations, it's recommended to only
  attempt to evaluate string values when explicitly requested
  to by the caller.


Best Practices For ``__annotations__`` In Any Python Version
============================================================

  * You should avoid assigning to the ``__annotations__`` member
    of objects directly.  Let Python manage setting ``__annotations__``.

  * If you do assign directly to the ``__annotations__`` member
    of an object, you should always set it to a ``dict`` object.

  * If you directly access the ``__annotations__`` member
    of an object, you should ensure that it's a
    dictionary before attempting to examine its contents.

  * You should avoid modifying ``__annotations__`` dicts.

  * You should avoid deleting the ``__annotations__`` attribute
    of an object.


``__annotations__`` Quirks
==========================

  In all versions of Python 3, function
  objects lazy-create an annotations dict if no annotations
  are defined on that object.  You can delete the ``__annotations__``
  attribute using ``del fn.__annotations__``, but if you then
  access ``fn.__annotations__`` the object will create a new empty dict
  that it will store and return as its annotations.  Deleting the
  annotations on a function before it has lazily created its annotations
  dict will throw an ``AttributeError``; using ``del fn.__annotations__``
  twice in a row is guaranteed to always throw an ``AttributeError``.

  Everything in the above paragraph also applies to class and module
  objects in Python 3.10 and newer.

  In all versions of Python 3, you can set ``__annotations__``
  on a function object to ``None``.  However, subsequently
  accessing the annotations on that object using ``fn.__annotations__``
  will lazy-create an empty dictionary as per the first paragraph of
  this section.  This is *not* true of modules and classes, in any Python
  version; those objects permit setting ``__annotations__`` to any
  Python value, and will retain whatever value is set.

  If Python stringizes your annotations for you
  (using ``from __future__ import annotations``), and you
  specify a string as an annotation, the string will
  itself be quoted.  In effect the annotation is quoted
  *twice.*  For example::

       from __future__ import annotations
       def foo(a: "str"): pass

       print(foo.__annotations__)

  This prints ``{'a': "'str'"}``.  This shouldn't really be considered
  a "quirk"; it's mentioned here simply because it might be surprising.