/
Ao
/
MaxReport
Обзор
Документация
Войти
/
Ao
/
MaxReport
Код
Запросы
0
Задачи
Вики
Пакеты
0
Релизы
0
CI/CD
Аналитика
Безопасность
master
pgsql/doc/src/sgml/html/wal-intro.html
48 строк
6 KB
AoAnima
first_commit
13 июл 2026, 17:47
13 июл 2026, 17:47
f1a670a
Код
Авторство
О чём код?
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no"?> <!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"><html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><head><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8" /><title>28.3. Write-Ahead Logging (WAL)</title><link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="stylesheet.css" /><link rev="made" href="pgsql-docs@lists.postgresql.org" /><meta name="generator" content="DocBook XSL Stylesheets Vsnapshot" /><link rel="prev" href="checksums.html" title="28.2. Data Checksums" /><link rel="next" href="wal-async-commit.html" title="28.4. Asynchronous Commit" /></head><body id="docContent" class="container-fluid col-10"><div class="navheader"><table width="100%" summary="Navigation header"><tr><th colspan="5" align="center">28.3. Write-Ahead Logging (<acronym class="acronym">WAL</acronym>)</th></tr><tr><td width="10%" align="left"><a accesskey="p" href="checksums.html" title="28.2. Data Checksums">Prev</a> </td><td width="10%" align="left"><a accesskey="u" href="wal.html" title="Chapter 28. Reliability and the Write-Ahead Log">Up</a></td><th width="60%" align="center">Chapter 28. Reliability and the Write-Ahead Log</th><td width="10%" align="right"><a accesskey="h" href="index.html" title="PostgreSQL 18.4 Documentation">Home</a></td><td width="10%" align="right"> <a accesskey="n" href="wal-async-commit.html" title="28.4. Asynchronous Commit">Next</a></td></tr></table><hr /></div><div class="sect1" id="WAL-INTRO"><div class="titlepage"><div><div><h2 class="title" style="clear: both">28.3. Write-Ahead Logging (<acronym class="acronym">WAL</acronym>) <a href="#WAL-INTRO" class="id_link">#</a></h2></div></div></div><a id="id-1.6.15.5.2" class="indexterm"></a><a id="id-1.6.15.5.3" class="indexterm"></a><p> <em class="firstterm">Write-Ahead Logging</em> (<acronym class="acronym">WAL</acronym>) is a standard method for ensuring data integrity. A detailed description can be found in most (if not all) books about transaction processing. Briefly, <acronym class="acronym">WAL</acronym>'s central concept is that changes to data files (where tables and indexes reside) must be written only after those changes have been logged, that is, after WAL records describing the changes have been flushed to permanent storage. If we follow this procedure, we do not need to flush data pages to disk on every transaction commit, because we know that in the event of a crash we will be able to recover the database using the log: any changes that have not been applied to the data pages can be redone from the WAL records. (This is roll-forward recovery, also known as REDO.) </p><div class="tip"><h3 class="title">Tip</h3><p> Because <acronym class="acronym">WAL</acronym> restores database file contents after a crash, journaled file systems are not necessary for reliable storage of the data files or WAL files. In fact, journaling overhead can reduce performance, especially if journaling causes file system <span class="emphasis"><em>data</em></span> to be flushed to disk. Fortunately, data flushing during journaling can often be disabled with a file system mount option, e.g., <code class="literal">data=writeback</code> on a Linux ext3 file system. Journaled file systems do improve boot speed after a crash. </p></div><p> Using <acronym class="acronym">WAL</acronym> results in a significantly reduced number of disk writes, because only the WAL file needs to be flushed to disk to guarantee that a transaction is committed, rather than every data file changed by the transaction. The WAL file is written sequentially, and so the cost of syncing the WAL is much less than the cost of flushing the data pages. This is especially true for servers handling many small transactions touching different parts of the data store. Furthermore, when the server is processing many small concurrent transactions, one <code class="function">fsync</code> of the WAL file may suffice to commit many transactions. </p><p> <acronym class="acronym">WAL</acronym> also makes it possible to support on-line backup and point-in-time recovery, as described in <a class="xref" href="continuous-archiving.html" title="25.3. Continuous Archiving and Point-in-Time Recovery (PITR)">Section 25.3</a>. By archiving the WAL data we can support reverting to any time instant covered by the available WAL data: we simply install a prior physical backup of the database, and replay the WAL just as far as the desired time. What's more, the physical backup doesn't have to be an instantaneous snapshot of the database state — if it is made over some period of time, then replaying the WAL for that period will fix any internal inconsistencies. </p></div><div class="navfooter"><hr /><table width="100%" summary="Navigation footer"><tr><td width="40%" align="left"><a accesskey="p" href="checksums.html" title="28.2. Data Checksums">Prev</a> </td><td width="20%" align="center"><a accesskey="u" href="wal.html" title="Chapter 28. Reliability and the Write-Ahead Log">Up</a></td><td width="40%" align="right"> <a accesskey="n" href="wal-async-commit.html" title="28.4. Asynchronous Commit">Next</a></td></tr><tr><td width="40%" align="left" valign="top">28.2. Data Checksums </td><td width="20%" align="center"><a accesskey="h" href="index.html" title="PostgreSQL 18.4 Documentation">Home</a></td><td width="40%" align="right" valign="top"> 28.4. Asynchronous Commit</td></tr></table></div></body></html>